"The question of ‘How are you going to pay for it?’ is now perennially used by journalists to challenge any proposal made by any politician on any issue, whatever its inherent merits might be.....

That correct answer is ‘We’re going to work for it.’ After all, how else is anything paid for? When the government has a plan to spend money it intends to put people to work. And to answer the question ‘How is it going to be paid for?’ the correct answer is ‘From out of the value created, which is why we’re doing it."
http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2018/07/24/the-right-answer-to-how-are-you-going-to-pay-for-it/

“I believe that if one doesn’t know something about the creation of money, one can make little sense of all the various crises that seem to be enveloping us today, both domestically and internationally. Because they are all interrelated and the globalised ‘money system’ is at the heart of it all!
http://positivemoney.org/2018/07/where-does-money-comes-from-the-graphic-novel/

As part of the lecture series between UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP) and the British Library, Stephanie Kelton speaks on why a government budget should not be looked at in the same way as a household budget
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IBEoWSiTHc

This is a very strong clue that government spending has in fact been woefully insufficient over the decades. We have locked ourselves into a demand-starved economic trap: stagnant wages, low growth, and tremendous cash hoarding at the top. This is the classic description of austerity, and like lowering deficits, austerity accomplishes the opposite of what its advocates publicly endorse.

1) Deficits are irrelevant — they’re not a legitimate policy objective.
2) The government cannot run out of money.
3) Taxes do not fund spending.
4) Spending in excess of tax receipts is not a problem.
https://medium.com/@richardbmcgee/the-great-deficit-scam-9fedb8987485